EVOLUTION vs. REVOLUTION
Mike Doyle is the
President of the CAGC – the Canadian Association of Geophysical
Contractors -
representing the business interests of the seismic industry within Canada.
The CAGC website may be
found at www.cagc.ca.
It has
been a tough couple of years. All of Canada is figuring out how closely it is
tied to the price of oil and other resources. Our dollar is dropping, EI rolls
are being hit in all Provinces, and our growth is slowing. We are absolutely
moving to a lower standard of living. The Celebrity Circuit decries the greed
of the Oil and Gas Industry which is allegedly ruining our world yet fails to
appreciate where their wealth came from – on the backs of a culture with
leisure time and excess money from a standard of living brought on by fossil fuels.
On this note an interesting article follows:
EVOLUTION vs. REVOLUTION
By Pierre Desrochers is an associate professor of
geography at the University of Toronto.
Magazine: Canadian Fuels Association - Perspectives
– Fuel 2015
From wind to horsepower to steam power and internal
combustion engines – how we get around has evolved our world.
Two centuries ago, renewable technologies such as
human and animal power, windmills and watermills helped feed and drive
economies for the world’s 1 billion human inhabitants. Those power sources
were, of course, the best available.
At that time, humans had a one in three probability
of being malnourished, average incomes of around a dollar a day and a life
expectancy of around 30 years. Life was short, even for most of the relatively
well off. Put another way, people’s average standard of living in wealthier
nations in the early 1800s was similar to the poorest rural inhabitants of
today’s least developed economies.
Then
something extraordinary happened….
Humans began to develop coal, crude oil and natural
gas-powered technologies. With the introduction of the internal combustion
engine, fuelled by hydrocarbons from petroleum, the commute to prosperity and
personal independence was underway. These innovations played a crucial role in
changing some very grim statistics.
In 2015, human life has improved beyond recognition
in most of the world, especially in developed countries. We are born, go
through our daily existence and die surrounded by petroleum-derived products,
and petroleum continues to be the most reliable liquid energy known to
humankind. It has brought us greater wealth by enabling swift and affordable
transportation, by bringing us consumer goods that improve our lives, by
fuelling the delivery of foods and other necessities from around the world—the
list goes on. Our resulting greater wealth has helped society build better
infrastructure, technologies and supply chains of all kinds that constitute our
best possible insurance against starvation and other potentially fatal
challenges.
The fact is, petroleum-derived products have
changed our lives, mostly for the better. And that reality isn’t going to
change any time soon.
Has our transformational relationship with
petroleum-based fuels arrived with some risk? Certainly. Greenhouse gas
emissions are a serious concern in many quarters of society and there is no
doubt that we must move forward with measures to protect the environment from
further harm. But the associated rewards of having modernized society through
the use of petroleum-based products far outweigh the hazards by most people’s
reckoning.
Consider a world without petroleum-based products.
Life as we know it would be brought at a near standstill, as roughly two thirds
of these products are used as fuels to power land, water and air
transportation. Cars and, to a lesser extent, buses, trains and aircraft give
us unprecedented individual mobility, not to mention the associated benefits
such as access to employment, more varied recreational options—in general,
greater prosperity and personal independence.
Equally important, the large-scale, reliable and
affordable long distance transportation of goods—be it by petroleum powered
trucks, railroads and container ships—has also delivered a wide range of
benefits.
Consider:
• improved nutrition with the concentration of food production in the
areas best suited to grow it, making food more plentiful, diverse and affordable
• the eradication of famines by moving surpluses from regions with good
harvests to those that have experienced mediocre ones
• large-scale urbanization and
the wealth creation that can occur only when a large number of people move away
from the countryside and into cities Can you imagine a world in which we would
be comfortable getting along without these conveniences and necessities?
Neither can I.
So, what do we do?
Many options, but no magic
solution
There is much wishful thinking in society about a
“revolution” in transportation energy that would see widespread adoption of
electric cars, for instance, or hydrogen fuel cells on the road in high
numbers. It’s an alluring fantasy indeed.
But I prefer to focus my attention on the
realities: No viable alternative exists at present to the high energy density,
affordability, relatively clean combustion, relative safety, greater ease of
extraction, handling, transport and storage of raw product than
petroleum-derived fuels. Alternative power sources such as wind turbines, solar
panels and geothermal systems that produce electricity are showing some
promising applications. And many talented individuals and organizations are
working toward incremental solutions that will, eventually, broaden the mix of fuels
available and the technologies to utilize them.
But where the rubber hits the road in today’s day
and age, electricity has been shown not to be of much practical use— at least
not until a radically new battery design comes along that can reliably and
sustainably power trucks, aircraft or container ships. Most locomotives
continue to be powered by diesel because battery technology is not yet a
realistic option for trains that travel beyond the geographical confines of
large urban areas. Generous taxpayer-subsidized research has enabled some
progress with battery electric, hybrid electric and plug-in hybrid vehicles for
regular Canadians. But we have not yet seen meaningful gains in market share
against gasoline or diesel-powered cars.
Part of the challenge is the limited power and
range of electric vehicles, the charging period they require, their performance
in cold weather (relatively poor) and security concerns, especially in
collisions. Another significant challenge is the time and investment Canada
will need to build a robust production and delivery infrastructure for
electrically powered vehicles. The fact is, you have to fill up somewhere, and
you can’t always be close to home. Realistically, Canada will need a national
network of fuelling stations for electric cars (likely decades in the making)
before Canadians will adopt these vehicles in high numbers.
One bright spot for alternative fuels is the recent
abundance and affordability of natural gas, which, in its liquid form, could be
a worthy option in some niches. But natural gas is not as energy dense as
petroleum fuels. And, again, Canada faces a challenge with the delivery
infrastructure for natural gas. Realistically, natural gas is well suited to
vehicles that have large storage capacity and that can return regularly to
fuelling stations. This makes it a viable alternative for city buses, which is
encouraging.
As for
biodiesel and ethanol, even Canada does not have sufficient agricultural
capacity to produce more than a tiny fraction of the fuel our modern economies
would require without gasoline and diesel.
The future will see incremental innovation
Most observers agree that over the next 25 years or
more, petroleum-based fuels will provide 85 percent of global transportation
needs. That’s the reality and we need to move forward as constructively as
possible within it. Without a doubt, climate change is a major concern and
focus for Canadians, and fossil fuels contribute to the GHG production that has
exacerbated climate change.
But we’re getting better.
The Canadian transportation fuel industry had made
great strides in reducing its GHG production at refineries (page 32). More
efficient fuel consumption by Canadians, better driving behaviors (page 26) and
smart urban planning are all part of the short-term solution to reducing
Canada’s GHG production (page 12).
Petroleum-based fuels are far from perfect.
And they clearly will not last forever. But they have been a remarkable
blessing to humanity, and the way humans use them continues to improve with
every passing year. Together, Canadians can make a difference in reducing
transportation’s environmental footprint by fully understanding the
complexities and options within our situation, by accepting the realities of
our continuing dependence on petroleum-based fuels, and by sharing in the real,
actionable opportunities for becoming more environmentally aware and
responsible within a society that will continue to be petroleum-based for many
years to come
Appreciate
what we have before fear and politics take it all away……..
From
Brainy Quotes
Growth is the only
evidence of life.
John
Henry Newman
Comments
Post a Comment